Identifying ecological production functions for use in ecosystem services-based environmental risk assessment of chemicals

نویسندگان

چکیده

There is increasing research interest in the application of ecosystem services (ES) concept environmental risk assessment chemicals to support formulating and operationalising regulatory protection goals making more policy- value-relevant. This requires connecting structure processes function henceforth provision goods their economic valuation. Ecological production functions (EPFs) may help quantify these connections a transparent manner predict ES based on function-related descriptors for service providing species, communities, ecosystems or habitats. We review scientific literature EPFs evaluate availability across provisioning regulation maintenance (CICES v5.1 classification). found quantitative nearly all ES, often complemented with valuation physical monetary flows. studied units potential extrapolation toxicity data test species obtained from standardised testing provision. A broad taxonomic representation providers was established, but models directly linking standard were extremely scarce. pragmatic way deal this gap would be use proxies related taxa stepwise functional valuation, which we conclude possible most ES. suggest that used defining specific (SPGs), illustrate, using pollination as an example, information ecological entity attribute dimensions SPGs. Twenty-five compiled biological entities ranging ‘colony’ ‘habitat’, 75% referring ‘functional group’. With about equal attributes ‘function’, ‘abundance’ ‘diversity’, SPGs therefore seem best substantiated by at level group.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Ecosystem services as assessment endpoints for ecological risk assessment.

Ecosystem services are defined as the outputs of ecological processes that contribute to human welfare or have the potential to do so in the future. Those outputs include food and drinking water, clean air and water, and pollinated crops. The need to protect the services provided by natural systems has been recognized previously, but ecosystem services have not been formally incorporated into e...

متن کامل

Advantages and challenges associated with implementing an ecosystem services approach to ecological risk assessment for chemicals.

The ecosystem services (ES) approach is gaining broad interest in regulatory and policy arenas for use in landscape management and ecological risk assessment. It has the potential to bring greater ecological relevance to the setting of environmental protection goals and to the assessment of the ecological risk posed by chemicals. A workshop, organised under the auspices of the Society of Enviro...

متن کامل

The role of ecological models in linking ecological risk assessment to ecosystem services in agroecosystems.

Agricultural practices are essential for sustaining the human population, but at the same time they can directly disrupt ecosystem functioning. Ecological risk assessment (ERA) aims to estimate possible adverse effects of human activities on ecosystems and their parts. Current ERA practices, however, incorporate very little ecology and base the risk estimates on the results of standard tests wi...

متن کامل

Farming for Ecosystem Services: An Ecological Approach to Production Agriculture.

A balanced assessment of ecosystem services provided by agriculture requires a systems-level socioecological understanding of related management practices at local to landscape scales. The results from 25 years of observation and experimentation at the Kellogg Biological Station long-term ecological research site reveal services that could be provided by intensive row-crop ecosystems. In additi...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Science of The Total Environment

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['0048-9697', '1879-1026']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146409